Parent companies owe a duty of care to employees of subsidiary companies

22 May 2012 | David Widdowson

The Court of Appeal has held that parent companies may owe a direct duty of care to employees of subsidiary companies.


The Claimant was employed by a subsidiary company of the Respondent approximately 50 years ago. Approximately 5 years ago the Claimant was diagnosed with asbestosis. The subsidiary company was no longer in existence and therefore, the Claimant brought a claim against the parent company of his former employer.

The Court of Appeal found that the real question is whether the way in which a parent company operates amounts to assuming a duty of care for employees of its subsidiaries. They identified a number of circumstances as relevant. These include where:

  • the business of the parent and subsidiary are in a relevant respect the same;
  • the parent has, or ought to have, superior knowledge on some relevant aspect of health and safety in the particular industry;
  • the subsidiary’s system of work is unsafe as the parent company knew, or ought to have known; and
  • the parent knew or ought to have foreseen that the subsidiary or its employees would rely on its using that superior knowledge for the employees’ protection.

In this particular case the Court of Appeal held that the holding company owed the Claimant a duty of care which it had breached.


This is a potentially important case. Prior to this judgment it was very rare for a holding company to be held to be liable in respect of an employee of a subsidiary. As a result of this judgment that will change where parent companies take an active role in the operational aspects of its subsidiaries.

In order to minimise the chances of a parent company being held liable in similar situations, companies should review their group structures and the role of the parent company in them, bearing in mind the considerations set out above. Depending on the parent’s involvement a re-organisation may be required to reduce the likelihood of the parent company of an employing company being found liable. Insurance arrangements should also be reviewed.


Chandler v Cape plc

For further information or to discuss the issues raised, please contact David Widdowson or Stephen Wright
on +44 (0)20 3051 5711.


Content is for general information purposes only. The information provided is not intended to be comprehensive and it does not constitute or contain legal or other advice. If you require assistance in relation to any issue please seek specific advice relevant to your particular circumstances. In particular, no responsibility shall be accepted by the authors or by Abbiss Cadres LLP for any losses occasioned by reliance on any content appearing on or accessible from this article. For further legal information click here.

Related content

13 June 2024
How to apply for certificate of residence in the UK
Where an individual is resident in the UK and has…
29 May 2024
UK Share Plan Reporting 2024: Everything you need to know
The deadline is approaching for the HMRC’s annual return filings…
20 May 2024
Employee Share Plan Reporting 2024: Alerting Your Clients
The UK tax authorities’ (HMRC) submission deadline for annual return…
Subscribe to our newsletter
Stay up to the minute on our latest news and insights?
International reach

We have helped clients meet their HR needs in over 70 countries across five continents.