Trial periods and flexible working requests

12 October 2012 | David Widdowson

The Flexible Working Commission (the “Commission”) has published a report which recommends that employers should be able to use trial periods following a flexible work request.

The legal position

The current legal position is restrictive. Following the receipt of a formal flexible working request from an employee with caring responsibilities, the employer must follow a tight 28 day timeframe in which to consider the request, meet with the employee and a further 14 days in which to make a decision.

If the final decision is to agree to a new working pattern then that arrangement will be a permanent change to the employee’s contract of employment. The tight timeframe means that a trial period is impractical and the current legislation does not allow for it. If the employer insists on making any change to the working pattern subject to a trial period then this will be in breach of the legal requirement as the change must be permanent.

In practice many employers suggest the use of a trial period but they cannot insist upon it. If the employee agrees to a trial period and the employer considers at the end of the trial period that the working arrangement has not been a success the employer cannot make any changes (including reverting to the previous working pattern) without the employee’s express consent. As there is no right to a flexible working pattern, only to request that the employer consider it, the tendency is to refuse as the employer (who might otherwise be willing to consider it on a trial basis) will not do so if agreement means a permanent commitment.

The solution

If and when the Government extends the right to request flexible working to all employees, and they have suggested they may do so in 2015, and not just to those with caring responsibilities, the Commission has suggested that the new rules include “a clear option for employers to use trial periods for new flexible work arrangements.”

Commentary

It is often unclear how a new working pattern will impact (positively or negatively) on the team or customers/clients. The law on trial periods is not supportive of employers or employees in this manner. In this sense, it is far better for the employer for any change to a work pattern to arise from an informal discussion with the employee and not from a formal and rigid flexible working request.

Perhaps an entire rethink in the way employers consider flexibility needs to be considered.

We will discuss this and other flexible working issues in our forthcoming seminar ‘How flexible is your workforce?’ to which you are warmly invited.

Resources

Flexible working commission’s report

For further information or to discuss the issues raised, please contact Emma Clark or David Widdowson on +44 (0)20 3051 5711.

Disclaimer

Content is for general information purposes only. The information provided is not intended to be comprehensive and it does not constitute or contain legal or other advice. If you require assistance in relation to any issue please seek specific advice relevant to your particular circumstances. In particular, no responsibility shall be accepted by the authors or by Abbiss Cadres LLP for any losses occasioned by reliance on any content appearing on or accessible from this article. For further legal information click here.

The author

David Widdowson
Senior Consultant
Employment Law
Mediation
Business Coaching
D: +44 (0) 207 036 8388
T: +44 (0) 203 051 5711
F: +44 (0) 203 051 5712

Also by the author

3 March 2021
Alternatives to Redundancies | Employers & HR Specialists
3 March 2021
UK Budget 2021: Furlough Scheme extended until September 2021
22 February 2021
UK Supreme Court Ruling – Uber Drivers Entitled to Workers’ Rights
Subscribe to our newsletter
Stay up to the minute on our latest news and insights?
International reach

We have helped clients meet their HR needs in over 70 countries across five continents.