Employment: Using length of service criterion in redundancy selection

31 January 2012 |

Since the introduction of legislation outlawing age discrimination in 2006 employers have generally been advised that “last in first out” or other service-related criteria for redundancy selection are best avoided.  However certain employers had binding redundancy selection processes, often negotiated with trade unions and often including length of service as one of a matrix of factors to be taken into account in selection for redundancy.

One such employer, Rolls Royce, has received confirmation from the Court of Appeal that while there is clearly an element of age discrimination in using length of service as a selection criterion, it may still be lawful if the employer can show that it is a “proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim”.

Although the decision is helpful to some employers in a similar position to Rolls Royce, establishing objective justification of a potentially discriminatory practice is a high hurdle.  Employment tribunals will look for hard data to evidence that the criterion does indeed support the employer’s stated legitimate aim, and employers will be well-advised to review this regularly to ensure that their justification remains valid in a changing business environment.

 

For further information please get in touch.

Disclaimer

Content is for general information purposes only.  The information provided is not intended to be comprehensive and it does not constitute or contain legal or other advice.  If you require assistance in relation to any issue, please seek specific advice relevant to your particular circumstances.

Disclaimer

Content is for general information purposes only. The information provided is not intended to be comprehensive and it does not constitute or contain legal or other advice. If you require assistance in relation to any issue please seek specific advice relevant to your particular circumstances. In particular, no responsibility shall be accepted by the authors or by Abbiss Cadres LLP for any losses occasioned by reliance on any content appearing on or accessible from this article. For further legal information click here.

Circular 230 disclosure

To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS and other taxing authorities, we inform you that any tax advice contained in this article (including any attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties that may be imposed on any taxpayer or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein.

The author


D:
T:
F:

Also by the author

13 January 2021
How to apply for certificate of residence in the UK
13 December 2013
Another victory for the UK Revenue against income tax avoidance
6 December 2013
Autumn statement 2013: Good news for employee share ownership and other welcome tax breaks
Subscribe to our newsletter
Stay up to the minute on our latest news and insights?