Employment: Equality Bill Update: responses to consultation on multiple discrimination proposals published

31 January 2012 |

The proposals aim to provide protection against multiple discrimination without placing undue burden on businesses.

Existing law requires individuals who have experienced multiple discrimination to bring separate claims for each type of unlawful discrimination.  For example, a black woman passed over for promotion by her employer because she is a black woman would have to bring separate claims for discrimination relating to sex and race.  The government argues that the current law makes it difficult to prove such claims.

The proposals would permit multiple discrimination claims only for direct discrimination and only for a combination of two of the following protected characteristics: age; disability; gender reassignment; race; religion or belief; sex; sexual orientation.  The proposals do not extend to pregnancy and maternity or marriage and civil partnerships.

A new clause was recently included in the Equality Bill, which is currently before the House of Lords, to reflect the proposals (see Related Article below on the Equality Bill).  It is expected that any changes will not take effect until April 2011 and that guidance will be published at least 3 months before implementation.

Comment

Some of the consultation responses express concerns that the proposals may place additional financial and administrative burdens on employers, including significant increases in the costs of defending claims.  The government will need to provide clear guidance on the changes to assist employers in reviewing their policies and familiarising themselves with any new law.  It is likely that large organisations will need a significant amount of time to implement any changes.  It may be wise for large organisations to begin reviewing their policies in anticipation of the new law.

 

For further information or to discuss the issues raised, please get in touch.

Disclaimer

Content is for general information purposes only. The information provided is not intended to be comprehensive and it does not constitute or contain legal or other advice. If you require assistance in relation to any issue please seek specific advice relevant to your particular circumstances. In particular, no responsibility shall be accepted by the authors or by Abbiss Cadres LLP for any losses occasioned by reliance on any content appearing on or accessible from this article. For further legal information click here.

Circular 230 disclosure

To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS and other taxing authorities, we inform you that any tax advice contained in this article (including any attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties that may be imposed on any taxpayer or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein.

The author


D:
T:
F:

Also by the author

13 January 2021
How to apply for certificate of residence in the UK
13 December 2013
Another victory for the UK Revenue against income tax avoidance
6 December 2013
Autumn statement 2013: Good news for employee share ownership and other welcome tax breaks
Subscribe to our newsletter
Stay up to the minute on our latest news and insights?