Changes to the TUPE regulations

16 July 2014 | David Widdowson

The ‘Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006’ (TUPE) have been amended.

On the sale or transfer of some businesses or in the event of a change of some service providers TUPE may apply.  As a consequence the employees who were assigned to the transferred business automatically transfer to the new business on the same terms and conditions of employment.

The new Collective Redundancies and Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) (Amendment) Regulations 2014 (unattractively shortened to CRATUPEAR) amend the previous legal position as follows:

  • Where a business is transferred, redundancies that occur following a change in the location of the workforce after the transfer are no longer automatically unfair.  This assists the transferee/new employer where there is a genuine place of work redundancy. However the dismissals could still be unfair if a fair process is not followed.
  • Helpfully for transferees, collective consultation for redundancies (required where over 20 employees are at risk of redundancy in a 90 day period) may be started by the transferor before the transfer and that period of consultation counts for the purposes of complying with the collective redundancy rules.  This is subject to the transferor and transferee agreeing to such consultation and the transferee continuing to consult meaningfully after the transfer.
  • Activities carried on after a ‘change in service’ provision (commonly applicable on outsourcings) must be ‘fundamentally or essentially the same’ as those carried on before if they are to fall within the new legislation and be treated as a “relevant transfer”.
  • The transferor must now provide certain employee information to the transferee at least 28 days before the transfer (which is an improvement from the previous short 14 day period).
  • Transferees/the new employer may be able to amend terms in collective agreements during the period of one year after the transfer, provided that the overall change is no less favourable to the affected employee.
  • Following recent ECJ decisions there will be a ‘static’ approach to the terms and conditions of employees who were covered by collective agreements when they were employed by the transferor.  This means the transferee will not be bound by any changes to collective agreements which take place after the  transfer date so long as the transferee is not itself a party to those collective agreements.
  • From 31 July 2014, small businesses with less than 10 employees will be allowed to inform and consult its affected employees directly if there are no recognised union or existing appropriate representatives.

Commentary

The changes are sensible and some of the changes (such as joint consultation and consulting directly with employees) reflect the commercial situation followed by many employers to date.  For many practitioners and businesses the changes do not go far enough and they are a watered-down version of the original proposals.

It is therefore unusual that Ed Miliband has recently supported a parliamentary motion to repeal CRATUPEAR in its entirety.

Whilst the motion (called an ‘Early Day Motion’) is rarely successful it provides an indication of the leader of the Labour party’s view on the new law and the possible consequences if Labour wins next year’s general election.  With three former employment lawyers currently in the shadow cabinet, the UK may see major changes afoot if the political landscape changes in 2015.

Resources

Collective Redundancies and Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) (Amendment) Regulations 2014

For further information or to discuss the issues raised, please get in touch.

Disclaimer

Content is for general information purposes only. The information provided is not intended to be comprehensive and it does not constitute or contain legal or other advice. If you require assistance in relation to any issue please seek specific advice relevant to your particular circumstances. In particular, no responsibility shall be accepted by the authors or by Abbiss Cadres LLP for any losses occasioned by reliance on any content appearing on or accessible from this article. For further legal information click here.

Copying

If you would like to copy or otherwise reproduce this article then you may do so provided that: (1) any such copy or reproduction is for your own personal use or if it is made available to any third party it is done so on a free of charge basis; and (2) the article is reproduced in full together with the contact details, disclaimer and any logos as they appear on each article.

Disclaimer

Content is for general information purposes only. The information provided is not intended to be comprehensive and it does not constitute or contain legal or other advice. If you require assistance in relation to any issue please seek specific advice relevant to your particular circumstances. In particular, no responsibility shall be accepted by the authors or by Abbiss Cadres LLP for any losses occasioned by reliance on any content appearing on or accessible from this article. For further legal information click here.

The author

David Widdowson
Senior Consultant
Employment Law
Mediation
Business Coaching
D: +44 (0) 207 036 8388
T: +44 (0) 203 051 5711
F: +44 (0) 203 051 5712

Also by the author

3 March 2021
Alternatives to Redundancies | Employers & HR Specialists
3 March 2021
UK Budget 2021: Furlough Scheme extended until September 2021
22 February 2021
UK Supreme Court Ruling – Uber Drivers Entitled to Workers’ Rights
Subscribe to our newsletter
Stay up to the minute on our latest news and insights?
International reach

We have helped clients meet their HR needs in over 70 countries across five continents.