No maternity leave in Europe for ‘commissioning’ mothers

16 July 2014 | David Widdowson

Background

The European Court of Justice (ECJ) has decided that a ‘commissioning’ mother (a woman who has a baby through a surrogacy arrangement) is not entitled to maternity leave, even if she breastfeeds that baby.

Surrogacy is increasing in the UK.  In 2007 37 parental orders were filed to register a baby born through surrogacy.  In 2011 this figure increased to 131 and 2013 saw 167 orders.  January 2014 alone saw 24 babies which may result in a record year for surrogacy in the UK.   The legal position may therefore become increasingly relevant to International HR.

The case

The ECJ considered two separate cases brought by an English and an Irish ‘commissioning’ mother.  After their employers had refused to allow them to take maternity leave, they both claimed sex and pregnancy discrimination and the Irish woman also claimed disability discrimination (on the basis that she was disabled because she did not have a uterus).

In line with previous EU case law, maternity leave is provided for two reasons:

  1. To protect the mother’s health after the vulnerable situation arising from her pregnancy; and
  2. To ensure the protection of the special relationship between ‘a woman and her child’.
  3. The ECJ decided that the women did not have the right to maternity leave under the European Pregnant Worker’s Directive (PWD).  This is despite the fact the British employee managed to breastfeed the baby within one hour of its birth.  The ECJ held that the ‘protection of the special relationship’ and the entitlement for breast-feeders to take maternity leave ‘presupposes that the worker….has been pregnant and has given birth to a child’.
  4. The ECJ also held that failure to provide commissioning mothers with maternity leave was not sex discrimination because a commissioning father who had a baby through a surrogacy arrangement would be treated in the same way as a commissioning mother.  They further held that it was not disability discrimination for the Irish employee not to receive maternity leave because her medical condition did not prevent her from participating in or advancing her employment.

Commentary

This is a sad decision for commissioning mothers but a logical analysis of the law.  The ECJ pointed out that member states may provide additional protection for its workers beyond the European directives if they so wish.

The UK is likely to implement laws in 2015 permitting commissioning parents to take adoption leave and statutory adoption pay in certain circumstances.  In addition, the UK’s definition of disability is not restricted to impact on employment but instead considers the impact of such disability on the employee’s ‘day to day’ activities.  Therefore it is possible that some commissioning parents may still be able to claim disability discrimination in the UK courts.

Resources

Pregnant Workers Directive (92/85/EEC)

CD v ST C-167/12 (ECJ).18 March 2014

Z v A Government Department and the Board of Management of a Community School C-363/12 (ECJ), 18 March 2014.

For further information or to discuss the issues raised, please get in touch.

Disclaimer

Content is for general information purposes only. The information provided is not intended to be comprehensive and it does not constitute or contain legal or other advice. If you require assistance in relation to any issue please seek specific advice relevant to your particular circumstances. In particular, no responsibility shall be accepted by the authors or by Abbiss Cadres LLP for any losses occasioned by reliance on any content appearing on or accessible from this article. For further legal information click here.

Copying

If you would like to copy or otherwise reproduce this article then you may do so provided that: (1) any such copy or reproduction is for your own personal use or if it is made available to any third party it is done so on a free of charge basis; and (2) the article is reproduced in full together with the contact details, disclaimer and any logos as they appear on each article.

Disclaimer

Content is for general information purposes only. The information provided is not intended to be comprehensive and it does not constitute or contain legal or other advice. If you require assistance in relation to any issue please seek specific advice relevant to your particular circumstances. In particular, no responsibility shall be accepted by the authors or by Abbiss Cadres LLP for any losses occasioned by reliance on any content appearing on or accessible from this article. For further legal information click here.

The author

David Widdowson
Senior Consultant
Employment Law
Mediation
Business Coaching
D: +44 (0) 207 036 8388
T: +44 (0) 203 051 5711
F: +44 (0) 203 051 5712

Also by the author

3 March 2021
Alternatives to Redundancies | Employers & HR Specialists
3 March 2021
UK Budget 2021: Furlough Scheme extended until September 2021
22 February 2021
UK Supreme Court Ruling – Uber Drivers Entitled to Workers’ Rights
Subscribe to our newsletter
Stay up to the minute on our latest news and insights?
International reach

We have helped clients meet their HR needs in over 70 countries across five continents.